Suki AI
Voice-first AI assistant for clinicians.
Overview
Suki is a voice-first AI assistant designed to handle clinical documentation, dictation, and EHR navigation. Clinicians can speak naturally to generate notes, place orders, and surface patient information. Used by health systems and physician groups for its broad EHR compatibility and speed of deployment.
- +Voice commands beyond just notes
- +Strong EHR integration
- +Trusted by major health systems
- +Fast onboarding
- -No public pricing
- -Premium price point
- -Voice-command value depends on clinician adoption
Features
Integrations
Articles that cover Suki AI
AI Pre-Visit Chart Summaries: What They Read, What They Miss, and a Pre-Charting Workflow
Epic, Abridge, Suki, Freed, Heidi and Commure now summarize the chart before a visit. We checked what each one actually reads (Epic's covers notes only, not labs or imaging), what the early research shows (about 18 seconds saved per visit at NYU; omissions are the most common error), how faster pre-charting affects time-based E/M coding, and a seven-step workflow.
Do Patients Actually Want AI Scribes? What the 2025–2026 Research Says
National polls in Canada and England find the public wary of AI scribes, while patients who have actually had one in the room mostly like it. Here is what the Stanford, Kaiser, Emory, VA, Canadian and Healthwatch data show, who is most hesitant, and how to ask patients so the consent conversation goes well.
Can Patients Get the AI Scribe Recording? HIPAA Access Rights After Raphael v. Mantei
A Washington court ruled in August 2026 that a patient had no right to her DAX ambient recording under state law. HIPAA asks a different question. Here is how the designated record set test applies to scribe audio, transcripts, and drafts, why it also defines information blocking, and the policy to write before the first request arrives.
Your AI Scribe Lists 100+ Languages. It Still Isn’t Your Interpreter.
Multilingual AI scribes are real, but 2026 research shows clinicians skip them in interpreted visits, and when they are used, 55-60% of interpreter errors land in the note. Here is what Section 1557 still requires (including human review of machine-translated patient instructions), what each vendor documents, and a visit workflow that works.
Your AI Scribe Heard the Confidential Part of the Teen Visit. Here's How It Stays Out of the Parent's Portal.
When the parent steps out, the ambient scribe keeps listening, and under the Cures Act the signed note can land in a portal that parents read in 64–76% of teen accounts. Here is what the pediatric scribe studies measured (and didn't), what HIPAA, state minor-consent law and the information-blocking exceptions actually require, and a five-checkpoint workflow for splitting, reviewing and releasing adolescent notes.